Select your state and see exactly what's required — disclosures, penalties, and licensing rules.
Looking up compliance rules…
Ohio
⚠️ MODERATE RISK
Statute & Effective Date
SB 155 / ORC §5301.95 — Effective March 2, 2026
Ohio's newest wholesaling law, just went into effect. This is the most specific statutory framework of any state.
Disclosure Requirements
Required: Written disclosure to property owner BEFORE contract execution
Must Include: Wholesaler status acknowledgment, advice to seek legal counsel, notice that wholesaler does not represent owner
Format: Specific statutory language, bold 12-point font minimum, separate document
Below-market warning: Must inform seller that offer may be below fair market value
Assignment & Licensing
✓ Can assign contracts without owner consent before closing
✓ Can charge assignment fee separately from profit
✗ No real estate license required for wholesaling
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Violations count as unfair/deceptive trade practices under Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (CSPA). Seller can void contract anytime before closing. Attorney General enforcement authority. Up to $10K fines, potential voided deals.
Key Differences
Most specific statutory framework (newest law as of 2026). Written disclosure requirement is strict and well-defined. No licensing workaround needed. Standard is assignment with disclosure.
Georgia
✓ LEGAL
Legal Basis
Georgia Fair Business Practices Act + Common Law / GREC Advertising Rules 520-1.09
Least regulated of all 8 states. Common law disclosure duties apply.
Disclosure Requirements
Required: Disclose intent to assign or sell contract at higher price
Required: Disclose assignment fee to all parties if assignment is used
Double Close Exception: No profit disclosure required if using double close
Format: No specific form required, but must be clear and transparent
Can only market that you have rights to assign property under contract
Cannot market property itself unless licensed
Compliance Strategy
Best Practice: Contract assignment with clear assignment fee disclosure. Alternative: Double close to avoid assignment transparency issues.
Florida
⚠️ STRICT MARKETING RULES
Legal Basis
Chapter 475 / Florida Statute 475.41
Legal to wholesale, but strictest marketing rules in America.
Marketing Rules (CRITICAL)
✗ CANNOT market the property itself — only contract rights
✓ CAN market the contract assignment and fee
Violation = potential criminal prosecution
Only licensed realtors can market real property (FL Statute 475.41)
Disclosure Requirements
Required: Must be clear about contract assignment in all materials
Required: Valid purchase agreement must exist before marketing
Key Rule: Do NOT market acquisition price ($120K) at end-buyer price ($150K+)
Instead: Market the assignment fee or contract markup separately
Penalties — SEVERE
Criminal violation of Chapter 475. Potential 3rd degree felony. Up to 5 years imprisonment. This is the most aggressive enforcement of any state reviewed.
Key Difference
Distinction between legal assignment and unlicensed brokerage is CRITICAL. Marketing the contract rights legally = marketing assignment fee, NOT property.
Effective January 1, 2024 — NEW notice requirement added
Disclosure Requirements (as of Jan 1, 2024)
Required: Written disclosure of "equitable interest"
Must Disclose To: Original property owner AND buyer-assignee (end buyer)
When: Before entering assignment agreement
Format: Written form required (TAC Rule 535.6 compliance)
Equitable Interest Defined
Legal right to eventually acquire legal title to property. Created when buyer and seller execute real estate contract. Assignable unless contract prohibits.
Assignment & Licensing
✓ Can assign earnest money contracts (default rule)
✓ Can use "and/or assigns" language in contract
✓ Assignments can occur with or without seller consent
✗ No license required for assignment (distinction from brokerage)
Key: Full disclosure = not brokerage; No disclosure + acting like broker = illegal brokerage
Key Differences
Specific "equitable interest" disclosure framework. Recent expansion (Jan 1, 2024) added notice requirements. Distinction between assignment and brokerage is clear.
Indiana
✓ LEGAL
Legal Basis
Indiana Real Estate Laws (common law basis, no specific statute number)
Less regulated than Ohio/Florida/Illinois. Common law disclosure duties apply.
Disclosure Requirements
Required: Transparency about intent to assign
Required: Intent must be clearly stated in contract
Format: No specific statutory form, but must be unambiguous
Court guidance: Cannot imply you'll close when you plan to assign
Marketing & Licensing
✗ Can only market contract rights, NOT the property
✗ No license required for single transactions or occasional wholesaling
⚠️ Limit: If pattern of "practicing real estate" (multiple deals), license may be required
Indiana courts: Do not support "secret profits"
Key Differences
Less regulated than Ohio/Florida/Illinois. Common law disclosure duties apply. Pattern of practice matters (threshold unclear but generally safe for few deals/year).
Illinois
⚠️ LICENSING THRESHOLD
Legal Basis
Illinois Real Estate License Act (RELA), amended 2019
Only state with specific transaction count threshold.
Licensing Requirement (CRITICAL)
✓ 1 wholesale transaction/year = OK without license
✗ 2+ transactions in 12 months = MUST BE LICENSED
Definition: "Dealing in real estate contracts" includes assignable contracts
Applies to pattern of dealing, not one-time transactions
Disclosure Requirements
Required: Full transparency to seller and buyer
Required: Clear disclosure of wholesaler role and intent to profit
Required: Cannot act as dual agent without consent
Option 1: Get licensed (becomes real estate broker, full marketing rights). Option 2: Use double closing (avoid assignment language). Option 3: Limit to 1 deal per 12-month period.
Penalties
Unlicensed brokerage activity violations. Cease-and-desist orders. Fines. Most restrictive of states reviewed.
Oklahoma
⚠️ NEWEST LAW (NOV 2025)
Statute & Effective Date
SB 1075 / 59 O.S. §858.102 and §858.314
Effective November 1, 2025 — Oklahoma now has the most restrictive wholesaling law in America.
Disclosure Requirements (MANDATORY)
Before Contract Execution, Must Include In Writing:
Intent to assign or sell property at higher price
Recommendation to seek legal advice before signing
Homeowner's statutory right to cancel within 2 business days without penalty
Plain English language (statute specifies)
Clear identification of wholesaler
Cancellation Rights (Seller Protection)
✓ Homeowner has statutory 2 business day cancellation right (NEW)
✓ Can cancel for ANY reason during 2-day period, no penalty
✓ Can cancel ANYTIME if required disclosures are missing
Earnest money must be returned to seller
Earnest Money Rules
Must be held in ESCROW ACCOUNT (not wholesaler account)
If disclosures missing: Seller keeps all earnest money
Penalties — SEVERE
Missing required disclosures = contract INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE. Wholesaler cannot enforce contract. Wholesaler must forfeit all earnest money. Seller keeps earnest money as penalty.
Key Differences
Newest law (November 2025). Strongest seller protections in America. Missing disclosures = total contract invalidation. Most aggressive enforcement expected given newness.
Arizona
⚠️ DUAL DISCLOSURE
Statute
HB 2747 / Arizona Revised Statutes §44-5101
Balanced approach with disclosure duties for both buyers and sellers.
Disclosure Requirements
Wholesale Seller Must Disclose To Buyer (Before Close of Escrow):
Written disclosure that seller is a wholesale seller
Seller holds only equitable interest (not legal title)
Seller may not be able to convey title to property
Wholesale Buyer Must Disclose To Seller:
Written disclosure that buyer is a wholesale buyer
Must be before parties enter binding contract
Marketing Rule
Must disclose in ALL marketing materials that equitable interest only
Cannot represent ownership of property
Cannot misrepresent title status
Cancellation Rights (Buyer Protection)
If wholesale seller fails to disclose: Buyer can cancel anytime before close of escrow
Buyer receives refund of all earnest money
No penalty to buyer
Key Differences
Balanced approach: both buyer and seller have disclosure duties. Focuses on equitable interest clarity. Less restrictive than Oklahoma/Illinois. Cancellation remedy is buyer-friendly.